Buy some of his
Smokers, the only group of people left on the planet that can be
offended and abused with impunity. Gays are out of the
closet,smokers are being forced in. Golliwoggs and Noddy are
burnt books, you cant use the word wog or nazi,it may offend.
But you can call a smoker anything you want we arent allowed to
can throw old smokers out in the cold from their retirement
homes but the dog can stay inside, speak volumes to me folk, but
as a smoker I have no right as to how and where I smoke a legal
Owners of business have had their freedom to choose who
comes into the establishment. Geez and Americans believe all
American are free under their constitution. You have every
reason to believe justice is blind. I do!!
Another huge price hike
slapped with another 10% price hike. Wont stop me ,you like
fleecing old ladies eh? Well 1 out of 5 new zealander smoke and
most of them will continue. I think your government
economists must be either dunces or completely thick. All you
are doing is taking a huge amount of money out of an already
crumbling economy. I am not dead yet at 63 and have been smoking
since I was nine. You can keep putting them up I dont care it
just means I dont spend my money elsewhere. Mutiple that by all
the other smokers, you lose suckers.
National Party and Mr Key are pro business. Duh, you are as
socialist as the Labour Party, you are all the same, control
freaks. get out of peoples lives, run the country, dont be a
nanny. Again you are losing the
huge sums of money Tobacco Comanys used to put into sport
,charities and advertising, again your loss, long live the
alcohol problems are lifestyle choice we make
knowing the risks, just like an extreme
Nuclear pollution is
forced upon us. Isreal, Iran, North Korea and
other countries are now carrying on the radition
poisoning of this planet.
And most people are
happy to allow the demonizing of tobacco for all
the worlds health ills because the other senario
is to hard to swallow
So you dont smoke so
you dont care. Lets go back as far as 1945 when
every man and his dog smoked. This was the time
of the first nuclear bomb test by the USA, since
then well up to 1998, 2053 nuclear bombs have
been test, over 1000 by the US, above and below
ground, 2 wiping 2 Japanese cities.Then the
Russians were at it all above ground one of
their bombs was so big they had to alter the
cargo bay of the plane used to drop it.
Then in come the
Poms(English), the french, the chinese. As I
stated before 2053 bombs in total.
And our governments
prefer that people who use their own brains dont
know that. You cant tell me that all those
blasts didnt have any affect on our air we
breathe even climate change.
respiretory diseases have quadrupled, cancer
rates are out of control.
Yet smoking rates
have decreased. So in comes my conspiracy
theory:-). These government needed a fall guy to
cover for their know indiscretions, what could
cause all these health problem to arise, hell we
cant tell the population its because we polluted
the atmosphere with nuclear radiation, which has
a shelf life of thousands of years. I know lets
blame it on smoking, and the unthinking will
swallow it and not think about other probable
End of theory, just
as an aside . Who is making huge money out of
the anti-smoking bullshit.
stormtroops and legal drug pushing
Anyway enough, I want
you to type into Google and type in The
Explosions of Every Nuclear Bomb To 1998.
So the doc does'nt
want to take his own medicine. He has lung
cancer and wants to end his own life when he's
had enuf, yet all through his working life he
has watched his patients suffer to the end.
He also said he was
an anti-smoker, one of those that told his
patients dont smoke and you want get cancer,
espesially lung cancer. Well he was lying to his
patients, just because you dont smoke doesnt
save you from any cancer, look at the stats for
Studys have shown
that the very air conditioned buildings that
smokers have been kicked out of can cause lung
cancer and of cause the old hoary chestnut
I guess smokers
should thank the holy rolling anti smokers for
Doc be a man take
your own medicine stop bleating, why should you
not suffer as the patients you have treated
have, especially as most of them would be the
smokers you loathed so much.
Listen anti, smoking
stormtroopers, I DON'T WANT TO GIVE UP!! And a
lot of people who are won't want to either.
Putting the price way out of their reach, is a
form of coercion, bloody force in other words.
So the quit line is humming eh. Well dont go on
their crap folk people who like me are no going
to give up even if we are forced underground,
are finding ways around the price hikes already.
Me I dont want to be a criminal just yet am
stocking up, but others have already gone to the
drug pushers of the illegal kind. Bloody strange
right?, when tobacco is a legal product.
The rate of dairy
robberies and other ciggie outlets have already
gone up and shopkeepers are being batttered or
dying because of the price of a cigerette. Good
eh? Well Mr Key thinks its ok.
Also the infaltion
rate you get told is a pack of lies, what must
the inflated cigs prices be doing to real
inflation rates? I for one each time they go up
spend less on other things. 700,000 smokers are
not buying product that would help the
government money problems cos their tax on the
choice of lifestyle is hitting the roof.
Do your worst you
alcohol swilling hypocrites, when my legal drug
of choice has gone underground I will watch as I
smoke my cheaper illegal tobacco as your alcohol
price hit the roof.
sick to death of my lifestyle
choice of drug being on the most
wanted list by the control
continue to cry about the stats
of how many of us die ayear 5000
but stats are made to say
whatever the control freaks
want. As I have said many times
and will keep saying if you
smoke and die you died of
smoking. Even if you say had
diabetes or pancreatic cancer,
kidney disease, Folk these are
not caused by smoking but they
go down on a smokers death
certificate as smoking related.
watched a program on c7 last
night. It was in a pub these
control freak were deciding
whether prisoners could smoke in
jail. No one will own up to
having been in jail but I will.
I was put on remand in Mt Eden
womens prison in the 60,s for 2
weeks. Each week I was given a
free ration of tobacco even if I
wasnt a smoker. And dont tell me
that the dangers of smoking
werent known then even when I
started smoking at 9 they were
known as cancer sticks. Bloody
hypocrites, standing there with
their own drug, alcohol, in
Alcohol is also a poison, it
causes diseases and cancers,
panceatic, kidney problems,
diabetes. It kills passively
innnocent ppl children die in
their thousands on the road from
family violent. I am sick of
going on about it. Again alcohol
cost the country 16billion
dollars smoking 1 billion and
smokers more than cover that in
taxes ripped of them by health
nazis who watch people die every
day from alc0hol and turn a
blind eye cause most folk drink
it. I gave it up because I was
gang raped by imbibers, beaten
by a booze fuelled husband. I
will not give up my smokes they
are all I have left and I enjoy
folk stay on the path of beating
smokers into oblivion , then see
who the control freaks go after
for their tax money. I am
positive it will be alcohol. If
I cant smoke I will eat myself
to death at least I will go
still enjoying something in
The man health nazis
let drown in his own fluid, I think from me had
memory his name was Rau Williams,had diabetes.
Smoking doesnt cause this!!!
They say last night
that they are trying to make smokers as
uncomfortable as possible, with price hikes and
draconian laws. These control freaks say they
are there to help. Bullshit,there are many
smokers like me who have no wish to give up but
these decendents of Hitler dont give a damn
about being helpful they want to force their
lifestyle choices on others this is called
totalitarizim. When creeps like this think it is
fine to force the mentally ill, the old who have
smoked all their lives out into all sorts of
weather to take away someones lifestyle choice
because they dont like it are called nazis. They
believe you should live life as they see fit.
Well I am stocking up
on my smokes and please try coming around and
telling me you'd like me to give up.
And if it is ever
banned I am prepared to die for my freedom to
choose. Ban it and I go on a get hugely fat
strike.Thats what happens to people who give
smoking up anyway. I hate this world because of
these lifestyle bashers, Take my lifestlye
choice away and I dont want to live in this
control freak health nazi world
A maori man before a
select committee on smoking past around his
heart, he had had a heart transplant. This man
should count himself lucky.
Years ago they let
one of his whanau drown in his own waste because
he was a smoker and drinker and would not give
up. This action was nothing less than tantamount
to medicinal murder. That man paid his taxes
thru pay and the tax he paid on his ciggies. But
no he would not tow the totalitarian line and
was left to die.
The man before the
committee, maori, known for being high users of
alcohol, ciggies, marijuana, and most commonly
the fatty boil up blames his problems on
smoking.....how much did the anti smoking lobby
pay him to do that.
If your a smoker you
death is attributed to that, even if your fat,
an alcoholic, a illegal drug smoker or just
genetically suseptable to what ever killed you.
The maori are still
listen to the white mans bullshit, when will
they ever learn.
Go to this story then
ask yourself why smokers are paying. Why is it
not sad that 100,000 die a year from alcohol
related deaths, from accident or disease?
I ask myself this
continually. If you dont your a hypoctite.
That alcohol cost the
country 16 billion a year, smoking costs 1
billion??????? Why am I a smoker paying for
those who harm themselves and others thru the
You go figure I cant
He too used
brainwashed children to get his fascist points
across. The children ar parliment with their
grandads coffin made of ciggy packet shoed a
pick of grandad he looked like a happy old man.
Did this man drink, eat boilups?
Why doesnt the
fascist running this vendetta against tobacco
use it to brainwash their children against other
killers like fast food boilups and booze.
lambasting of smokers is sickening, I have
smoked for 53yrs aint dead yet but I sont drink
alcohol and I dont do boilups and fast food. My
heart and lungs are fine.
But the bashing of my
choice of legal drug is doing my head in
Why? Wasn't getting the
population to stop smoking supposed to lessen asthma rates.
As smoking rates drop, asthma rates soar. You explain that
to me please.
Diabetes, 8000 a year die from it
here. Many of those now dying of diabetes are ex-smokers who
gave up and took up eating. Many of those who die, drink
excessive amounts of alcohol.
Who is paying for these deaths,
not the junk food junkies, not the alcohol soaked. The
smoker is paying and paying and paying.
Lets just say all smokers gave
up, who would pay then eh.
Another teenager dies
of alcohol poisoning, but hey there is no cause
to raise the taxes.Lets tax the smoker though
its really really sad when they die age from
maybe 60 onwards.
We cant tax the booze
to many people imbibe they may vote us out next
election eh Mr key.
These people worry
only about their power, the smoker doesnt moan
about the rises they just keep on smokin. But
hey tax the drinker and the shit may hit the
Teenages are dying
everyday from the drink either by poisoning or
road kill, but what the hey lets tax the pooh
out of the smoker they dont moan, they also dont
cause road kill, but what the hey at least the
teenage drinker went sozzled and happy. So sad
to see a smoker die though cos they are paying
for the road kill and the poisoning.
Nevermind that the
A+E's are full of patients harmed or dying from
booze related injuries. Very sad but lets not
tax them the smoker can cover the cost they dont
moan and who else would we tax to pay for it.
Doesnt matter that
rapes, assault, murders are caused by booze
fueled lovely people who we camt tax eh? The
smoker will cover the cost of broken home,
beaten wives and children by booze fuelled
idiots. Smoking is never the reason for this but
they dont moan so let them pay for the carnage.
And it isnt addictive eh, no lets not talk about
the drunks who cant control their habit, end up
living on the streets who cares smokers can
all. The pollies protect them for fear of their
jobs and the boozers are hypocrites cos they
dont wanna pay for their killer drug.
And I wonder why I
loathe the world I live in I am a filthy smoker
used and abused to save the hypocrites from the
Told you my first
husband beat me after coming back from the pub,
well he was a maori. To marry him I had to
become a Ratana. I am pakeha. I never changed my
religious status although I am an atheist.
But they tell us if
you feel maori you are, so tena kotou katou.
The 3 Black Power
members who raped me were maori and pissed and
Now maori love their
booze their fags of both variety. Tobacco and
maoripyjamas. They love there boil ups their
hangi's their fast food, need I go on.
I can hear them now
as I write this, she's a racist, well I cant be
I feel maori.
There are in any race
the good and the bad. The point I am trying to
make here is in a lot of cases maori smokers who
die also are drinker drug takers and obese, but
die it is smoking
that killed them some of them that die have also
die at a ripe old age but hey it cant be just
old age eh, or their eating habits eh, or too
much alocohol eh.
The maori party, are
nowing sucking up to the very same hypocrites
they are supposed to be railling against.
Oh and tobacco was
given to the world by American Indians, hell who
knows maybe they are laughing too, they are
killing off the very people who nearly wiped
I have three grown
children capable of making their own choices in
life, only one of them smoke. He is hard
working, pays his taxes, but like me is
absolutely sick of the control freaks of the
He has worked in
Australia for the last 15 years to get away from
the control freaks here in new Zealand but the
Aussie nanny state is just as bad. So he has
studied hard to become an English teacher and is
now moving to Russia to teach it.
Mum, he said the west
is now more commie than the commies ever were. I
can go there and smoke where-ever I please. Good
on ya son, but why should I leave the country of
my birth so that I can once again be in control
of my own choices. He is right, Hitler won the
war, he would be rolling around in his grave
laughing his goddam head off.
So you think you are
free in the western world? HA! Think again.
The west is now the
most controlling governments of the world.
You cant offend
anyone. What happened to freedom of speech..
You cant call a
golliwog a golliwog. They are even burning books
so to speak .You can't read Noddy to your kids
folks cos Noddy and Big Ears are gay, but hang
on you can offend gays anymore. Oh and gays now
are some off the worst anti-smokers. Don't they
remember how they where pushed into the closet?
Yet they are perfectly capable of pushing
smokers into it.
And I am not
homophobic I have a gay son who I love very
You think you own
your property. Barhumbug, council can come onto
your property at anytime with there nanny state
edicts, even tear it down if to them it is
unsafe. God how I hate the word SAFE.
It is what the use to
control you. Me, I am now a depressed,
agorophobic, social phobic. I absolutely detest,
mistrust and find people so hypocritical I
cannot leave my house. I have anxiety attacks
and my brain has decided I am right when I do on
the odd occasion venture out it screams at me to
go home if I dont it causes me excessive pain to
the point that I think my next step will be my
And this folks is not
because of smoking it is because of the damage
done to me by alcohol.
I was abandoned twice
by my mother, once by putting me in a orpanage
and by putting me in a catholic home for wayward
I have been gang
raped by men off their faces with booze. My
first husband beat me senseless when he come
home from the pub every night. But National and
Labour dont think that matter, dont over tax
booze we may get voted out because the majority
do it.. Tax the smoker again they dont fight
back. let the smokers pay for hospital A+E that
fill up nearly ever night with drunken idiots
who brawl, binge drink drive their cars and kill
themselves or the innocent.
Thats ok eh? Let the
smoker pay for the thousands of women and
children who finally leave their abusive
husbands. Let the smokers pay for the drunks who
come home and beat their children. Its ok Eh.
Let the smokers pay for the carnage on the road
caused by drunk driver Thats ok eh. You f...ing
bloody hypocrites .
I could go on and on
and probably will I am not a wowzzer I use to
bing drink too in my youth Mr Key, and the
drinking age then was 21 you hypocrite.
Smokers who read
this, if you dont vote Act next election you
deserve everything you get.
Thats all I need to
say about the matter. If 700,000 smokers vote
ACT next election the other hypocritical parties
will get the message. And they are hypocrites
what they are saying is the alcohol kills
nobody, causes no deaths. Its not that that
worries them really. If they put taxes up on
booze they would fear the next election because
the majority have a tipple of some sort.
Hey Winston heres
your chance to get back in too.
I gave up alcohol
because over my life it caused the most probems
. A husband who beat me regularily after
returning from the pub. And I was gang raped by
drunks when I was 35.
I have smoked since I
was 9 I am now 62 and will go to my grave with
two rude fingers in the air and a smoke in my
hand. So sod of holyrollers.
"Whose business is it
who smokes in bars?" asks Joy Faulkner,
Libertarianz Spokesman to deregulate tobacco.
"I'll tell you," she says, "it's the business of
the person who owns the business - the
bar-owner. If others wish to patronise that bar
- or not - based on that bar-owner's decision,
then that is their business; they are free to
"It is definitely not
the business of Annette King, Sue Kedgley, Trish
Fraser or Margaret Wilson who smokes where,"
declares Faulkner, who is also coordinator of
international group, Smokers of the World Unite.
"These bossy-boots busybody bitc
Smokers - Whose
business is it?
Freedom - Less Government
The world is full of
Chicken Lickens, and I am not talking about KFC.
I am an agorophobic and I often wonder why there
are'nt more folk like me. I am aware though that
this disorder is growing. And with all the fear
mongering in the world I can understand it.
Chicken Licken for
those that don't know ran about yelling the sky
is falling, bit like the boy crying wolf.
Now please I am not a
complete idiot, we live in a vast universe on a
planet called earth. Like the universe, like the
earth, like humanity it is all evolving. It has
taken billions of years and many changes,
climatic and volcanic.
During those years
the earth has wobbled on its axis it rotates
closer and further away from other stars in the
galaxy and planets in the solar system, it is a
natural progression of the planet. These chicken
lichens in the world including the anti smoking
doomsayers drive their opinions with fear and
Who is aware of the
one most important elements in the
atmosphere???? It is carbon we live and breathe
it. These nay and doomsayers believe humanity
drives the planet. Well bullpucky I say. We
humans are but a grain of sand on the beach , a
gnat on the bum of a camel.
could do as much damage as us so called
polluters. How much of this carbon should be
removed from our atmosphere? Nature and the
universe the wobbling on earths axis are climate
change are a natural phenonom. Speak to
geologists, they see the different climate
changes in rock, by drilling ice cores from
perma frost. Any changes found and the further
back these samples go, climate change is
evident, with or without humanity.
Should we now imagine
that dinosaurs pooped themselves into
extinction, ate their way through the earth
vegetaion enuf methane and defolage to cause
Well agorophobic or
not I am sure we will go through climate change
it is nature and the universe at work, nothing
these kneetremblers say or do will stop that.
Get a grip folk, shit
happens and the planet will be here and changing
for a few more million year we waste huge amount
of money on these kneetremblers, anti,smokers,
greenies and doomsayers.
Lets get back to
being the humanity we once were and filter this
money into our pioneering spirit so we can
explore the universe and find other planets to
Oh silly me the
kneetremblers would say it is impossible and
terribly unsafe. Grrrrrrr
My son has an honours
degree in Medisinal Chemistry and his response
to the following article was...."What a load of
WEll I agree son ,
most of these studies are a load of bollocks. If
you believe the following article you have no
Damage from passive
smoking can be found in the blood vessels of
children just 10 years old.
Parents who smoke in
the home can cause their child's arteries to
show signs of clogging and hardening,
dramatically raising their overall life-time
risk of heart attack.
A German study which
took in almost 400 10-year-olds found those with
smoking parents could also have emerging signs
Earlier research has
shown a link between second-hand smoke and the
condition in adults.
"To show that in
healthy 10-year-old kids they've got these
increased markers of what we normally associate
with a really bad risk of heart attack is
alarming," Australian atherosclerosis expert
Professor David Celermajer said in reaction to
"This is from being
exposed to passive smoke from their parents all
"These children are
not about to drop dead when they're 11 or 12 but
it indicates they're a three or four-fold higher
risk of heart attack in their 40s or 50s."
Prof Celermajer, of
Sydney University and Royal Prince Alfred
Hospital, says an Australian study conducted in
1996 also found evidence of blood vessel damage
in 15-year-olds who were exposed to passive
smoke in the home.
He says while
research suggested these ill effects could be
reversed within two years if the child lived in
a smoke-free house, for many the ramifications
of parental smoking were life-long.
"I see a lot of
people with heart attacks in their 40s and 50s,
who have no risk factors at all except having
exposure to passive smoke in childhood," Prof
"So it starts a
process that becomes accelerated in that person
... (smoking) casts a long shadow."
A coalition of health
and child welfare organisations says the study
showed why government needed to speed up
"This is more
evidence pointing to the need for all public
areas frequented by children including dining
areas, playgrounds, public pools, beaches and
sports fields, to be made smoke-free by law,"
says Protecting Children from Tobacco spokesman
"... and for any
governments that have not yet made cars carrying
children smoke-free to do so quickly."
"Environmental tobacco smoke and cardiometabolic
risk in young children" is published in the
European Heart Journal.
As most of the folks
on these lists know, I've not only done no Obama
bashing, but I've jumped on people who have. In
these groups we are not Democrat or Republican
or even Libertarian.
We are a big mix of
people all of whom (except for the lurking
Antis) have one thing in common: we feel smokers
are being treated unfairly and unjustly and we
feel that this has been done on the basis of
lies created and promulgated by activist
Antismokers and by those who live off the
hundreds of millions of dollars in antismoking
grant money from the MSA funding and from the
NicoGummyPatchyPeople pushing their nicotine
therapy products. Aside from our disagreement
with Obama's SCHIP tax, the rest of his politics
is something we should keep out of these groups
if we want people to continue working together,
and in particular we should make clear that we
do not in any way support the
not-so-thinly-veiled racism that we see so much
of on the internet in the attacks on his
But today Obama went
over the edge. He not only broke a campaign
promise, but he lied, lied absolutely without
question, on national TV. And the lie he told,
if we lie back and accept it without screaming
long and loud, relegates us officially to the
status of unpersons, of vermin not worth even a
thought because we officially simply do not
exist as citizens of America.
Below are two
postings. I made the first one on several boards
early this morning. I am now putting up
variations of the second one. If you see a board
somewhere discussing his Today show appearance
and/or his health care plan, feel free to borrow
from or outright paste from the below to get our
We are NOT unpersons.
We are NOT vermin. We are Americans and we will
NOT tolerate being erased.
- Michael J. McFadden
This morning's post:
If President Obama is
depending on bloggers for support I think he may
have a problem. We're not nearly as forgiving as
Meredith Vieira on the Today show. Think about
which is worse? #1
below or #2 below?
1) President Obama
said, "The only tax change I've made in the 6
months I've been here is to cut people's taxes."
He said that -
despite the clear and recorded fact that he
raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised
the tax on one of the poorest well-defined
minority groups in the country, smokers so poor
they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and
scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT
(from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority
group averages well under $25,000 a year in
income... not over $250,000 per year.
2) That Meredith
Vieira simply let him get away with such a
blatantly false statement without even a hint of
Bloggers won't let
him get off so easily.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting
I have to admit, I am
truly, completely, totally mystified.
promises is one thing. Even when they are broken
blatantly and without apologies.
Lying is something
clearly, without ANY doubt or quibbling
whatsoever, blatantly lied to the cameras this
morning on the Today show and NO ONE seems to be
raising the issue.
Obama said, and I
quote exactly as you can see in the original
"The only tax change
I've made in the 6 months I've been here is to
cut people's taxes."
He said that -
despite the clear and recorded fact that he
raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised
the tax on one of the poorest well-defined
minority groups in the country, smokers so poor
they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and
scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT
(from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority
group averages well under $25,000 a year in
income... not over $250,000 per year.
He said that, and
Meredith didn't even wince, much less even TRY
to pretend to be a journalist and ask him about
And in all the
previous postings on this board today, no one
else seems to give it any importance either.
He **LIED** - no
waffling, no minor prevarication, no slight
mis-slip-of-the-tongue, he LIED just as
blatantly as if Bush had said "We've set up no
holding facilities for terrorists offshore." and
no one seems to be calling him on it.
Can anyone offer an
explanation for this???
McFaddenAuthor of "Dissecting Antismokers'
McFaddenAuthor of Dissecting Antismokers'
BrainsMid-Atlantic Director, Citizens Freedom
Alliance, Inc.Director, Pennsylvania Smokers'
Action Network (PASAN)
Everyone who knows me
also knows that I abhor alcohol. I never touched
it in my life and probably never will – unless
it’s to celebrate the defeat of the Therapeutic
The smell of alcohol
turns my stomach (literally), and drunken people
drive me nuts. Sometimes I even feel a surge of
anger when I see a person’s speech and brain
become progressively sluggish, embalmed in the
stupor of self-induced idiocy.
Those are my emotions
– but that is not a moral judgement, it is not a
condemnation – and, especially, it is not a call
for prohibition, control, regulation, and
brainwashing of children and adults. That is
because, fortunately, I have principles, thus I
am not an “anti.” Indeed, I fight the “antis”
with all I have.I submit here that society is
getting progressively drunker on contemporary
environmentalism and healthism.
The new fanaticism
vomits panic, prohibition, regulation, control,
surveillance, bureaucracy, state agencies, an
idiotic perception of safety, and so on. It
stinks with cheap moralism and arrogant contempt
for dissent. Junk science and false information
aimed at inducing “safe,” “healthy,” and
“politically correct” behaviour belch at us
noisomely.This drunken system sees dangers and
risks everywhere. The real problem, the toxic
system itself, cannot recognize the very real
danger it represents, boggled as it is with
multiplied visions of its paranoid fears.
Stupefied bureaucracy and politics are so much
under the influence of healthism that they can’t
even count to ten, thus the only number they
understand is zero. Zero risk. Zero tolerance.
Zero emissions. Zero
drinking. Zero accidents. Zero obesity.For that
awful drunkenness I have infinite contempt. I
call urgently for its suppression, and yes, that
is a moral judgement. In this particular regard,
surely and confidently, I advocate every
strategy of war. Evil deserves to be strangled.
It must be stopped. There is only one
circumstance under which I am an anti, which is,
when it comes to suppressing and annihilating
the anti mentality. For it I have zero
tolerance. Why? Because, for those intoxicated
people, everything that makes life worthwhile
can be happily sacrificed to suffocate and
control their targets.
free markets, integrity, personal
responsibility, politics, logic, truth, justice,
employment and fairness are to them like the
mindlessly motivated planetary gears in a
differential: they have to change constantly to
accommodate the drive. In other words, all those
social conquests – some earned with blood – can
all be redefined to accommodate the healthist
crusades. The costs become irrelevant next to
the projected and theoretical benefits of their
ideology, implemented with “pretzel-logic”
at this website, for example [stored
link]. It represents a gang of
non-governmental organizations that are
preparing for the suppression of alcohol through
Everyone reading here
should be familiar with the pattern: it is that
of the war against tobacco. The alcohol industry
is depicted as the bad, sleazy guys eager to
make money by killing people. The customers of
the industry are its victims. The infectious
agent sent out by the corrupting industry is
advertisement. It follows that alcohol
advertisement on the Internet (and everywhere
else) must be suppressed – just as happened with
The youth card is, of
course, abundantly played. Please name a bigot
(or a tyrant) who has not screamed “the
children!” …Thank you, I knew you couldn’t think
Finally, the junk
science epidemiological stunner cannot be
missing: did you know that drinking “causes”
HIV?...Remarkably, the will of the “victim” is
never, ever in the equation: the consumer has no
resolve to refuse/ignore advertisement or to
control his own behaviour. His judgement is
impaired by his “addiction.” If he weren’t
addicted, he would unquestionably agree with
state control. Thus he is a totally passive
recipient of “evil.” Such a brainless piece of
meat needs protection. He may protest now, but
he will love us later, when he has accepted Big
Brother. The omniscient zealots are ordained (by
themselves) to protect him and his children
against himself (and the evil industry of the
moment), whether he likes it or not.
Necessarily there is
only one way to protect the victim from himself
and the evil industries: forbid/control
advertisement and knock out the fundamental
right to information and choice. There are
efforts to control the Internet already [stored
fights against that [stored
Tyranny rests on
information control and the last venue of
tyranny today is public health. Healthism has
mounted an epic power grab. It must control the
industries to control the people. This is
nothing new. The control of private industry by
the state through a “social pact” is at the very
core of the Mussolinian Fascist economic
To achieve a Fascist
agenda, it is first of all necessary to redefine
rights, and shift them to those of people like
me, the teetotaller. That is done by using the
nihilistic “right of not.” In the Italy of
Mussolini, the “right of not” vastly prevailed
over the “right to do,” since this convention
allowed the state to interfere infinitely in the
lives of its citizens, and thus control them,
through “tough laws.”The passion for “tough
laws” is quite visible today.
It is a terminology
abundantly abused by governments and media. A
“tough,” oppressive law was supposed to signal
the political will of the Fascist oppressor to
be “damn serious,” to “intervene,” with total
disdain for citizens’ will and behaviour, and
thorough contempt for all the precious values
that the state disapproved of.
Today we see an
abundance of “rights of not” – i.e., my “right”
of NOT being exposed to the behaviour and smelly
breath of the drunk, the “right” of NOT inhaling
someone else’s smoke, the “right” of children of
NOT having smoking or fat parents as role
models, and so on.The oppressor feeds on hate
and relies on a popular appetite for the same
meal. He knows he must make this palatable for
the masses. As even a tyrant needs to project a
semblance of justification, a farcical
performance of credibility is the inevitable
side dish, offsetting the main course of vicious
mass-production of epidemiological junk studies
lavishly paid with public funds to the
complacent university near you, or "polls" paid
by public health institutions that show
"overwhelming" popular support for smoking bans.
The obvious conflict of interest is to be
totally overlooked in times of state propaganda.
Fools who have
swallowed this will swallow anything, and the
potential for violence of an incited mob, is
link] for just two examples.Continuous
reference to authority and heavy paternalism is
another essential element of Fascism. Does that
sound familiar to my British friends? The
“undisciplined” Italians have experienced that –
and that ‘s why they have the reputation of
being undisciplined in the first place, although
the new generations are forgetful. Most nations
never experienced Fascism directly and, for that
reason, now tend to fall for the same cheap
bedazzling lures: safety (playing on panic),
health (an illusion of immortality), and
protection (the disguise of subjection).
Now as before,
liberty becomes a devalued commodity. Then as
today, the trap was “liberty from” rather then
“liberty to.”In combating the Fascist mentality,
appeasement does not work, arguing is futile,
logic does not apply. Civilized, tolerant
behaviour is perceived by Fascists as a comical
sign of weakness. The “antis” cannot be reasoned
with or bargained with. When they concede
something it is just to buy time to repress it
Chamberlain did not
understand that, but Churchill did, and said,
“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping
it will eat him last.” Sir Winston understood
Fascism as well as he would understand the
Baby crocodiles may
be cute and cuddly, and they may even be gentle
and lovely. Kill them while you can, or you will
become their next meal.Alcohol industry be
warned. Defend yourself, or repeat the mistakes
of the tobacco industry, and thereby meet your
The food nazis are
going to medicate your bread with folic acid.
Good eh?? Well for me it is because I can now
say I warned you years ago when I had my
activist group Smokers of the world Unite and in
a previous message .
anti-smoking hysteria came in these nazis have
insisted on additives in ciggies which can be a
risk to the smokers health.
Folic acid in your
bread and you cant say no, it may cause prostate
cancer in men but never mind it may save 4 kids
from spine abifita.
It is how the anti
smoking stormtroops work but you dont listen,
the majority must suffer for the safety of the
So what next you may
ask...like I said there will be a knock on your
door one day and an employee of nanny state will
insist on checking your house for bacteria.
Well I would rather
keep smoking with 2 rude fingers in the air than
allow this nanny state to live my live, medicate
my food and monitor my risk taking.
The majority of the
world population get all they deserver because
they allow this to happen.
Get off you arse and
start screaming before your life is not your
There are 2 legal
drugs in this world Alcohol and Tobacco. Both of
these have health related risks. One also cause
many car fatalities, broken marriages, child
abuse both physical and mental. Both cause
addiction. But one also cause violence in the
community, can be the reason for rapes and
One of these legal
drugs would only cost $3.60 a pack but for the
huge tax take which makes it approximately $13 a
pack thats 75% geez and Aussie are saying they
are going to put it up to $20 a pack.
Smokers you are not
worth fighting for.
I have gotten my
crystal ball out although this is already
happening in a small way.
An American CARTON of
cigs still only costs $12US. Work it out with a
pencil folk, the criminal element will be
applauding this and are already selling stolen
or imported cigs from ships yachts etc and
making a killing on them.
Buy a carton of cigs
from overseas and sell them pack by pack for the
price of the whole carton...WOOT!!
Alcohol, say a carton
of beer you can by at a supermarket for $12
bucks it is not taxed at 75% like ciggies. and
yet it causes more problems in our courts and
families and communities than cigarettes.
There is something
wrong here, but its all about money folk and
power folk, these puritanical bastards could
care less where I die of smoking. But smokers
are now about 20% of the population, nearly 75%
of the population imbibe a little or a lot of
If the powers that be
attack alcohol they would lose their power,
smokers barhumbug , you have to have someone to
hate, you cant hate jews, you cant hate gays,
you cant be racist but you can bash a smoker
over and over again you can eventaully turn them
into a criminal because they have to go to the
crims for their smokes, or push them into the
closet, that other minorities have struggled out
of and thats fine.
I am an old lady I
have smoked since I was 9 I have become an
agorophobic and a social phobic and am on an
invalids benefit. A smoke is my only enjoyment
in life. I am this way because I was raped by a
drunken gang. I was beaten by a drunken husband,
I was seperated from my father and 3 sibling,
then abused by a boarder my mother had.
But I am a dirty
filthy smoker and I deserve all I got and
alcohol is not my prefered legal drug, being on
a benefit I will soon have to go look for a crim
who will sell me my legal drug cheaper than I
can get from the legalized drug pushers.
It all really beats
me. This page no longer is here to speak for
other smoker it is here for me alone to scream
spend trillions and trillions of taxpayers money
on social engineering.
Enuf pls was this
really what goverment where elected for? To live
our lives. To control our risks in life?
If we had put a stop
to all this crapola decades ago and spent the
money on the human instinct to pioneer to go
where no man has gone before, warp drive may
have been invented by now. The moon may well
have already be populated with space stations
and we could be populating nw found planets.
Hell sorry what am I
talking about, waffling into my webpage again.
Its just not safe is it?
We have built a space
bubble around each and every person on earth at
I offer myself up to
be the first pioneer on another plant cos I am
dead sick of this one.
Tolerance for some,
vilification for others, is the policy of
"public health authorities."
"You do not get HIV
from:* Being bitten by mosquitoes or other bugs*
Being bitten by an animal* Eating food handled,
prepared, or served by somebody with HIV
infection* Sharing toilets, telephones, or
clothes* Sharing forks, spoons, knives, or
drinking glasses* Touching, hugging, or kissing
a person with HIV infection* Attending school,
church, shopping malls, or other public places
with HIV-infected people."- Surgeon General
Antonia Novello, 1992 Surgeon General's
Report on AIDS"At the beginning of the AIDS
epidemic many Americans had little sympathy for
people with AIDS. The feeling was that somehow
people from certain groups “deserved” their
Let us put those
feelings behind us. We are fighting a disease,
not people. Those who are already affected are
sick people and need our care as do all sick
patients. The country must face this epidemic as
a unified society. We must prevent the spread of
AIDS while at the same time preserving our
humanity and intimacy."-C. Everett Koop, 1986,
the first Surgeon General's
Report on AIDS"
ASH recently forced a
major university to stop an employee, who took
smoke breaks outside his smoke free office, from
working in the same office with a women whose
health -- and the health of her unborn child --
were threatened by his thirdhand smoke,
according to testimony from two of her
doctors....to avoid being barred, smokers likely
have to change clothing, shower and shampoo, and
use mouthwash."-John Banzhaf, Action on Smoking
and Health (ASH)
press release, March 25, 2009It's evident
from the quotations above that our attitudes
regarding risk and health have gone askew. In
1986 we knew the Surgeon General himself placed
a priority on "our humanity and our intimacy".
Today, we all know that we can't get AIDS from
kissing a person with AIDS, and that we can't
get AIDS from sharing a toilet seat. A Surgeon
General’s Report endorsed these facts and ideas
in 1992. The public remembers, and generally
continues to endorse them.Somehow though, ASH
would like for us to believe that one needs to
change clothing, use mouthwash and do laundry if
they go outside for a smoke. This is to protect
others from the residual particulate matter on
smoker's clothing; a contrivance called "third
hand smoke". Meanwhile, while the notion of
"third hand smoke" has entered the vernacular, a
search of the Surgeon General's
website and the Centers for Disease
regarding "third hand smoke" comes up empty
at this writing. (Please feel free to search
yourself at the in-text links provided.) This
absence of information is troubling given the
willingness of health practitioners and policy
makers to invoke "third hand smoke" as a
justification for instituting healthcare and
policies haven't been adopted in any way by
public health. Rather, ASH, an organization that
thinks smokers should be
arrested for homicide, is lobbying for these
policies to be enacted."Third hand smoke" is
really a misnomer; the residual smell left on
clothing from burnt tobacco is only arguably
"third hand" and it most certainly is not
"smoke". In fact, “third hand smoke” is a
catch-phrase, coined to promote a health scare,
designed to destroy “humanity and intimacy.”
There has been no epidemiological study to
demonstrate that being exposed to residual
tobacco smells represents any kind of risk to
anyone. Anti-tobacco zealots simply want to
instill that belief. They want to make smokers
feared and hated. That has been their goal for
decades. “Third hand smoke” is the latest tactic
in the long-escalating war against
smokers.Science and truth have never gotten in
the way of the anti-smoking agenda, and ASH
hardly conceals their contempt for tobacco users
comments like: ""We've always known that a
smoker's breath stinks. Now we know that it also
creates indoor air pollution which can harm
children and perhaps some adults." One might
think that such statements would subject the
motives of ASH to a greater level of
professional scrutiny. To the contrary, it's
obvious that health institutions now act
according to the guidance of ASH and other
anti-smoking groups. Also, the lack of
epidemiological evidence and government guidance
hasn't stopped the
politicians from leaping into action to
protect children from a non-existent menace.
This alarmist approach to matters of public
health has become commonplace, especially when
it comes to tobacco. One would hope that
government health authorities would step in to
set the record straight, or that they'd issue
guidance advising health practitioners to regard
the claims of special interest groups like ASH
with skepticism, at least until credible
evidence can be produced. To the contrary, it
appears that anti-smoking interests lead
government health authorities by the nose. It
also appears that the Surgeon General and CDC
remain complicitly silent until they feel
confident that the anti-smoking interests have
been successful in pitching their scare du jour
to the public. Former Surgeon General Richard
Carmona has already
declared that there "is no safe level of
exposure to secondhand smoke". Once the coast is
clear, the Surgeon General and the CDC are
likely to make similar claims regarding "third
hand smoke".Not so long ago, public health took
an entirely different approach. When the AIDS
outbreak came along in the nineteen eighties,
gay men, in particular, were falling prey to a
mysterious killer virus that laid waste to the
immune system itself. There was no effective
treatment and no known cure. The devastating
nature of the disease immediately attracted the
attention of the sensationalist media. In no
time at all, fear, speculation and
misinformation spread across the country. Far
right religious groups immediately fanned the
flames of hysteria by claiming the AIDS virus
was a biblical plague with a moral agenda. The
infectious nature of the disease seemed to
confirm the suspicions of anyone who was
ill-at-ease with homosexuality. Last, the
prevalence of the disease amongst gay men seemed
to be the excuse that every homophobe had been
waiting for to justify and exalt their hatred
for gays.In 1982, 466* people had died of AIDS
with hardly an eye blink from public health, and
scientists proposed calling the new disease "Gay
Related Immune Deficiency". 1 AIDS deaths more
than tripled in 1983, and a June, 1983 Gallup
poll revealed that 25% of the population felt
that they could contract AIDS via "casual
contact with an AIDS sufferer". 2 The CDC hadn't
even appointed a group to investigate AIDS until
the end of 1983, and when the group reported
back in April of 1984, $20 million of additional
federal funds had to be requested because 70
percent of those working on AIDS at the CDC had
been diverted from other work areas. 3 In 1984,
evangelist Jerry Falwell said in a televised
interview that he didn't "hate homosexuals",
just their "perverted life-style" and
"sub-animal behavior". 4
Surgeon General C.
Everett Koop did not release a report on AIDS
until 1986. Approximately 10,000 people had died
from AIDS in that year, and nearly 25,000
people** had died since 1981.Only after Koop's
1986 report did the Surgeon General's office
finally respond by providing credible
information to the public regarding AIDS. The
public was beginning to learn that AIDS is not
transmitted by sharing a toilet seat or shaking
hands. The reports from public health, if
dismally overdue, were necessarily appropriate.
They tamped down the flagrantly expressed hatred
of homosexuals which early news about AIDS had
inspired. The public health message was
conceived to that end. An ill-conceived public
health stance would have meant social ostracism
for homosexuals.That didn't happen. Rather,
tolerance was called upon to deal with the
crisis. Efforts were made to disabuse the public
of misconceptions they had regarding both AIDS
and homosexuality. Heterosexuals, of course,
were not immune from AIDS, and this fact became
very clear when basketball legend
Earvin "Magic" Johnson announced he was
carrying the HIV virus in 1991.
arose as to whether Johnson should be allowed to
continue playing basketball. Johnson did so, and
no one contracted AIDS from playing with him. It
seems clear that social attitudes of the time
regarding homosexuality are what allowed much of
the health community to delay while tens of
thousands died. Once the media caught hold of
the prevalence and nature of AIDS, it was
largely up to gay rights groups and the very
same media to set the record straight while
public health scrambled.The health issue of AIDS
and the health issue of tobacco are entirely
separate things. It is not my intent or purpose
to imply that completely disparate health issues
should be held to the same informative criteria.
However, there are over 60 million tobacco users
in the U.S., and tobacco is a legal product. The
U.S. Constitution guarantees all equal
protection under the law via the
Fourteenth Amendment. Therefore, tobacco
users are entitled to government treatment that
is as ethical, responsible, and professional as
that received by anyone else. Also,
informational campaigns regarding tobacco use
must treat the perfectly legal behavior with the
very same tolerance it affords to any other
group whose legal behavior leads to public
health's epidemiological scrutiny.
As John Adams said,
"We are a government of laws, not of men".
Engaging in any kind of private sexual behavior
should, of course, be legal under Federal law.
Tobacco use, also, is and should be legal under
Any changes in
Federal Law going forward are
Ex Post Facto, and cannot be held to account
regarding the unjust treatment that the Federal
Government has already allowed and endorsed
regarding tobacco use by allowing Federal public
health policy to be influenced by entities that
hold tobacco users in contempt. The legality of
particular behavior, first and foremost, should
afford anyone engaging in any such legal
behavior the very same tolerance and protection
as any other group, and any further distinctions
are irrelevant if they are not matters of law.
Under the law, the disparate legal behaviors of
citizens should not be subjected to prejudicial
scrutiny or preferential protection. To believe
otherwise is to remove the blindfold from Lady
Justice.HIV is mono-factorial: one must somehow
contract the AIDS virus to be diagnosed with
AIDS or test positive for HIV. Any cancer
including lung cancer, as well as heart disease
and other "smoking-related" illnesses are
Non-smokers, and even
non-smokers who haven't reported any significant
exposure to any perceived risk factors,
sometimes get lung cancer. Since
10 to 15% of lung cancers occur in
non-smokers each year in the U.S.A., even public
health's statistical voodoo attributing around
3,000 annual non-smoking lung cancer deaths
to secondhand smoke fails to account for
thousands of people who never touched tobacco in
their lives. Meanwhile, the anti-smoking
campaign adopted by both anti-smoking interests
and public health have swept tens of thousands
up in the
social stigma they've created in making
tobacco use a synonym for lung cancer. Once upon
a time, public health worked hard to ensure that
there would be no social stigma regarding
mono-factorial AIDS, and it didn't matter if you
contracted AIDS due to using illegal IV drugs or
engaging in multiple sexual liaisons without
protection, or if you contracted AIDS via a
blood transfusion. AIDS required tolerance, and
it wasn't just tolerance regarding homosexuals,
it was tolerance regarding the disease of AIDS
because human beings all deserve respect.How
different would our attitudes about both
homosexuals and AIDS be today if Jerry Falwell
and his ilk had been given charge of the health
agenda regarding AIDS? I doubt that anyone would
find comfort in the knowledge that Falwell
didn't "hate homosexuals" but thought their
behavior to be "perverted" and "sub-animal".One
could argue that homosexuality is not a choice–
the issue of “nature and nurture” – while
smoking is. Granted, but this argument
completely misses the point. Illegal drug use,
for example, is a choice.
Who amongst us would
want someone like Jerry Falwell calling the
shots regarding how our current society treats
marijuana users? What if a personality like
Falwell went about the country influencing the
medical and rehabilitative treatment of IV drug
users? Would we consider that a responsible and
ethical approach to public health?The delusion
that those sympathetic to the cause of
anti-tobacco seem to operate under is that
ethical, knowledgeable, professional public
health experts are particularly concerned about
tobacco use and, because of that concern, they
are approaching the issue with an ever vigilant
watchfulness dedicated to consequence,
objectivity and reason.
To the contrary,
dogmatic zealots are manning the helm when it
comes to the public information and perceptions
regarding tobacco use. Homosexuality does not
"cause" AIDS. Similarly, neither smoking nor
exposure to tobacco smoke "causes" lung cancer.
In the same way that religious beliefs regarding
homosexuality and AIDS can be morally obtuse, so
can equally dogmatic, secular notions regarding
tobacco use. Jerry Falwell had firmly placed
himself within our culture as being anti-gay
long before AIDS came around.
John Banzhaf had ensconced himself in the
anti-smoking movement decades before anyone had
ever dreamed of the notion that secondhand
smoke, nevermind "third hand smoke", causes
disease. "Third hand smoke" is yet another
attempt by Banzhaf and his ilk to see how
effective their outrageous claims will be at
convincing an alarmingly uninformed and
credulous public to persecute people who use
tobacco. So, can you get lung cancer from a
toilet seat? No. But public health is perfectly
willing to abide when equally ridiculous claims
are made by anti-smoking groups like ASH. Not
only do public health officials fail to put an
end to this nonsense, it appears that they are
taking a wait-and-see approach to see if
anti-tobacco groups will be successful in
spreading irrational fears. If the anti-tobacco
groups are successful, then public health will
emerge from the shadows with a blessing and
endorsement for the lies spread by the
Public health doesn't
care if you lose your job, lose your spouse,
lose your children, or lose your friends.
They'll ruin your life before they'll let you
have a perfectly legal cigarette. Allowing
groups like ASH to run the public health agenda
of our country is quite like empowering Jerry
Falwell to pave the way regarding national AIDS
policy. If that had occurred, your television
and radio would tell you to be afraid to embrace
or work with people who are gay, and reluctant
to share bathrooms with them.
It appears that this
is pretty much where public health policy is
going regarding tobacco use, and probably
obesity as well. Public health seems to have
lost sight of the fact that we are all human
beings, and we all deserve to be treated with
dignity, tolerance, respect and equal treatment
under the law. At the very least, even a public
health policy that discourages smoking should
draw the line at allowing anti-smoking
evangelists to spread fear and lies regarding
tobacco and its users. Public health needs to be
cleansed of the influence of zealous special
interests and financially motivated
pharmaceutical makers. Permitting the spread of
more hatred, lies and irrationality will keep us
on the destructive path which public health has
followed for decades.
Whatever happened to
public health’s concern regarding "our humanity
and our intimacy"? Public health's current
approach to tobacco policy is not only wrong,
it's outrageous, and it should be decried by
all, whether they use tobacco or not.____
If you climb a
mountain and fall to your death. The gummit
sends out rescue teams, to help in the search at
the cost of the tax payer. The climber is made
out to be some sort of hero. Hello, climbing
mountains is a lifestyle choice and the risks
are know to the climber, but we are meant to
wail and weep for this person.
You get on a plane,
it crashes on take off ,all dead. Sad I know,
but you got on that plane knowing the risk, you
were prepared to take it. But the airlines are
forced to pay huge payments to greiving
families. Why? You know the risks. I could go on
for ever here. No pls I hear you scream lol.
75% of the cost of a
packet of ciggies is tax folk and yet we are
told or threatened with the fact if you get
really sick we dont deserve to be treated like a
When I was diagnosed
finally after many cat scans with depression,
agorophobia and social phobia I was told my
lungs, my heart were in great condition for a
61yr old?? If I died right now they would blame
it on smoking?? EH??
I have been smoking
since I was 9 this makes 50 yrs of my preferred
I am told every cig
is killing me. Well hell I am glad I didnt
choose tobacco to commit suicide with:-).
It is my risk, I know
the risks even back when I was 9 they were
called cancer sticks or coffin nails. But folk
its my bloody choice but now I am a leper in
society. Its a damned legal product for god
sake, it opposition legal product is alcohol, it
kills maims has related diseases, that kill cost
the taxe payer millions. But hey everyone drinks
so they stay very mum about it problems on an
individual by individual basis.
Get a grip, give the
smoker some slack folk. I often wonder as I sit
here in my own solitary confinement , why with
all the fear and guilt tactics used by the
health stormtroopers and the anti=smokers, that
there aint more ppl like me.
As I lay me down to
sleep, I pray thee Lord that you will keep, The
Nico-Nazis wide awake, From noises that their
I am a smoker Lord
you see, An outcast from society, But I don't
tell those pious parrots, To cut out fats and
eat their carrots!
Oh Lord the virtuous
vultures pick, And call my smoke a
"Cancer-Stick", Yet I don't look at their
Big-Mac, And say "enjoy your Heart-Attack"!
Why does every
sanctimonious soul, Preach to me about
self-control, Well if they're perfect I'll stand
alone, And dare the sin-less to cast the first
I am aware that one
day I'll die, I guess You know how when where
and why, So if its from smoking my tombstone can
say, From ashes to ashes, she loved life her
Are you safe, god I
hate that word now. The health Stormtroopers,are
wollowing about in your life because you let
We wrap our kids in
cotton wool, do you let you child climb trees,
ride a bike without a crash helmet. Do you worry
continually about what you are putting in their
lunch box. When you go to a pack and someone
lights a cigarette do you move???
We are a world driven
by fear and guilt the words "not save"
overpowering. Pls folk can you get agrip life is
full of risk.
I am now an
agorophobic, social phobic. I cannot leave the
house. beleive me I want to but the poor
depressed brain has taken over. If I leave the
house the brain takes over it informs my body to
get back home , it does that by causing
excruciating pain. The longer I stay out the
more the fear produces symptoms,
hyperventilation, sweats and I believe I will
die with the next step.
I blame the gummint
I have a pack of
ciggies in front of me ......oh dear you stupid,
dumb, brainless, old fart. Yeap thats me. On
this particular pack there is a pic of a limp
cigaerette. It has the usual vague, threat of
impotence becide it which states: Smoking may
make you impotent. Omg, shock horror probe, no
pun intended. This is how the antis suck the
brainless and those who believe everything they
are told or read as gospel. They also always use
the word may. I really aint that stupid of
course in the odd case it may cause impotents.
But dont quote that bit pls.
I will use 40 year of
anti-smoking reteric to plead my case that the
cases of impotenece would be no more than the
same disease from alcohol. Remeber they used the
same tactics to allow prohibition of alcohol
many years ago. But I digress.
My uneducated stats
show me, and btw damned stats can tell you
anything you want. Go back the 40 years we
smokers have been driven by fear and guilt and
back to impotence. When I was a child the
smoking rate was something close to 60% of the
population. I come from a faimly of 6. Thank you
god for no birth pill, ppl back then had 11 to
15 kids sometimes more. They would end up in
back street abortions because they couldnt cope
with anymore kids. Here I end my impotence case.
Lets just wander a
bit to asthma, again I am sure in some of the
cases that it maybe the cause or at least an
agitator. But again 40 years have past with the
anti-smoking stormtroopers blaming amost every
know disease on the demon tobacco. Over these
year the rates of asthma have quadrupled so how
can you blame smoking for that rate?? It really
makes me angry.
Who are the
healthiest countries in the world. If you
correlate it to smoker per population counties
like Japan, Italy, China, are high on the good
health list. Now if anyone argues it because of
their diet I will scream. If diet is the health
damager leave me the smoker alone and attack ppl
with bad diets PLS!! lol
The USA, and top anti
smoking countries like New Zealand have rapidly
gone down hill. Please dont believe me check the
health stats. Quick because they realise the
stats are not in their favour and the fudge
them, grrrrr. Enuf for today I can hear the men
in the white coats coming down the drive :-)
to fight cigarette smoking over the past 40
years amount to more than a victory for public
health. They are also, as Ted Kings new book
makes clear, a cautionary tale of how the state
can bully, and ultimately crush, members of a
momentarily-unfashionable minority group. Just
because you don't smoke doesn't mean you
shouldn't be afraid."- Tucker Carlson
OMG, shoot them all for the common good.
OMG, what does the common good really mean?
Who defines the common good? Common people.
Take swine flu for example. 140 ppl world
wide have died and we have a pandemic, jeez
wayne! More people die of the regular flu.
Don't you think the control freaks have gone
a little bonkers. Whose body is it anyway?
If I have the flu and want to treat it by
old fashioned traditional methods, one of
these control freaks could come to my door
if I sneezed on them they could force me to
go to a hospital. I dont want to go to
hospital. This is my body. I want to treat
it my way.
This is just a rehearsal. Please don't be
alarmed. The men in white coats are arriving
Thank you for visiting.